12/26/2023 0 Comments Gawker hulk hogan tape trialHe won six WWE championships and was inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2005 by Sylvester Stallone. Hogan, perhaps the biggest star in WWE’s five-decade history, was the main draw for the first WrestleMania in 1985 and was a fixture for years in its signature event, facing everyone from Andre The Giant and Randy Savage to The Rock and even company chairman Vince McMahon. Gawker denied that its lawyers leaked the information and said that many people had copies of the video, along with the audio and the transcript. In a statement, Hogan apologized for using “offensive language.” Hogan suffered swift backlash: World Wrestling Entertainment Inc. Some of that information included Hogan making racist remarks. The yearslong lead-up to the trial has been messy, with attorneys for Hogan accusing Gawker’s lawyers of releasing confidential information from the video to the news media. Gawker posted a one-minute, 41-second clip from the full, 30-minute video. Although the video was delivered to Gawker anonymously in 2012, other celebrity gossip sites had mentioned the video and at least one published photos. The Hillsborough County State Attorney declined to press charges. It is still unknown how the video surfaced in the news media, although a Tampa Police report points to a former employee of Clem’s as the possible culprit. “Readers should also have the right to get the story behind the celebrity story.” “I care about the readers having the right to know both sides of a story,” he said. Denton said Gawker had the right to publish the edited video because Hogan talked in detail about his sex life before the video’s release, which made the story newsworthy. In June, Gawker founder Nick Denton told The Associated Press that the fight for the right to publish the video was an important one, both for his news organization and the First Amendment. Those who weren’t dismissed were asked about their exposure to the story in the news media and whether they follow celebrity news. Of the 114 who responded to a summons, all but 48 were dismissed by noon. Many of the prospective jurors weren’t thrilled about the possibility of a weekslong case. Nearly 500 potential jurors were summoned about 100 of those were told to return Wednesday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |